Watchdog Blog

Carolyn Lewis: Illiterate Journalism at the Grassroots

Posted at 10:27 am, February 21st, 2008
Carolyn Lewis Mug

If you want to take an accurate temperature of the state of journalism, it might be helpful to focus not on the major national publications, but rather on some smaller papers that serve local communities. Here you can find bald examples of what generally ails the news business.

First, illiteracy. “The Delaware Wave” is one of two weekly papers that serve a rather large geographical area in southern Delaware, including several towns. It’s owned by the Gannett company, which also owns a number of other small and large papers across the country, plus the “News-Journal,” the major state daily in Wilmington. Here is a sampling of what I found in the most recent (February 13) issue, my corrections in parentheses:

“As a cynic (critic) of the current system, Cape Henlopen High School Athletic Director Bob Cilento believes ……”

“Office space was attained (obtained) by reorganizing the office.”

“Services will be supplemented ahead of schedual (schedule).”

“One afternoon program has been working to hype students up (I have no idea) about doing their homework.”


These samplings are typical of what the paper offers week after week.

Second: What is seen as fit to print emanates almost entirely from what officials are saying. Except for an occasional feature, there is almost no original reporting.

Disgusted by the paper’s failure to report the effect of the housing slowdown on the countless workers who have been building houses here during the boom, I wrote a letter to the editor that was published in the same issue of “The Wave.” I said that even though the paper was publishing page after page of sheriff’s sales of foreclosed houses, the editors seemed to be blind to the resulting human tragedy.

Ironically, in the same issue there is a story about foreclosures, written by a reporter from the Wilmington paper. It concerns animals that are abandoned when owners desert their houses – a touching tale, but I can only conclude that what happens to animals is newsworthy, while humans are destined to remain invisible.

I know these small papers are traditional training grounds for beginning reporters, but I believe readers have a right to expect that those who are hired are well acquainted with the English language. And where they goof (I confess I made plenty of goofs myself when I was reporting), they should be corrected by a more experienced copy editor before the error lands on the printed page. But this paper has a kind of careless, slapdash quality, as though nobody is exercising oversight and nobody really cares. What’s sad is that the young reporters are learning that it’s all right to write sloppy copy because they can get away with it.

It isn’t as though the paper’s owners are too poor to hire good staff. “The Wave” is always fat with ads and inserts, and behind it is the largest news organization in the U.S. The paper serves a growing area where retirees from nearby cities including New York, Washington and Philadelphia are settling permanently or buying properties they use or rent in the summer season.

Oh yes, you should see what story takes up the entire front page of this issue. It’s about a school board’s efforts to prevent students from transferring from one school to another in order to take part in a particular kind of athletics. A large color photo of two wrestlers graces the page and there’s a long jump page inside. It’s a respectable sports story, but on Page One?



5 Responses to “Illiterate Journalism at the Grassroots”

  1. fred says:

    Wow, bitter former Gannett employee Carolyn Lewis goes after the young editor of a free shopper!

    Now these ARE questions that journalists should ask.

    Carolyn’s priorities are right on the mark.

  2. Carolyn Lewis says:

    Bitter? Sorry, nothing of the kind. Disappointed that Gannett’s idea of journalism is so lousy, sure.
    The young editor is responsible for what gets into the paper. What is published reflects her journalistic values. Whoever hired her reflects his/her management values.
    How can we defend the First Amendment right when it is used merely to sell sausages instead of enlightenment?

  3. Moose says:

    Unfortunately Gannett is like so many other media conglomerates, cash cows masquerading as the fourth estate.

    The real question is, what can bedone to return the news media to proper government watchdogstatus, regardless of grammar? Because untilthat happens,democracy is as real as a quarter behind the ear.

  4. Victim of Neal Swartz says:

    A disclaime:although it maybe off the topic
    Hello Carolyn Lewis

    Do you remember your story on the child abuser (or Genocial Maniac towarsds L.D./dyslexic) Neal Swartz and Cedars Acamedy? If so? You one a Few brave people of Del. stand up to Swartz along with Ted M. But Neal Swartz was always above the law, he controled the Del. state gov. to the press and media. Bottom-line it’s a vast Neal Swartz conspiracy. Why Neal Swartz has escape justice? Beacuse he has the money? or Connections to policial group say the right and left-wing groups? or the Anti-War movement is protecting him(since he and his wife are members) or he a “Black ops spooke” of the CIA or KGB? Also did you still do more reports about him? until strong armed not to? Anyway i hope you are the real deal? If not? my apologies

    P.S. Do you want to know how Ted is doing? I’ll act as a contact person for you

  5. Victim of Neal Swartz says:

    I see the “Neal Swartz” Mafia has taken over this board

Comments are closed.

The NiemanWatchdog.org website is no longer being updated. Watchdog stories have a new home in Nieman Reports.