Watchdog Blog

Barry Sussman: The torture coverage

Posted at 1:50 pm, April 22nd, 2009
Barry Sussman Mug

We planned our Nieman Watchdog series on torture before President Obama released four secret memos that spelled out what techniques interrogators could use, thereby unleashing furious public reaction and an enormous wave of news and editorial page coverage.

Now it seems that what we had in mind—keeping Bush administration torture and other abuses of power alive in the press—is almost redundant. For the moment, the drive for more coverage looks impossible to kill or even slow down.

Leading the way is the New York Times with an April 22 story that lays out in rich detail how the torture got started. “The process was ‘a perfect storm of ignorance and enthusiasm,’ a former C.I.A. official said,” and the lengthy Times story proves that to be an understatement.

And an example of editorial page reaction is this one, also from April 22, in the Des Moines Register, calling for prosecution:

That shameful chapter should not be compounded by pretending it’s enough to have released information about another breach of human decency and then move on. A thorough investigation must determine who was responsible, and they should be prosecuted as warranted.

The question at this point is whether coverage and concern has reached a critical mass so that they can’t be stopped or whether, despite the white heat of the moment, the story will fade after a while.

The main forces to keep the story alive—to get to the bottom of what happened and to take action—are the legal justice system and Congress. In both, especially Congress, there will be resistance to a serious investigation.

The role of the press changes slightly now. It needs to continue reporting the story of torture and other Bush administration abuses, of course. And it also needs to cover how the White House, Justice Department and Congress moves on the torture story, day by day.

One Response to “The torture coverage”

  1. sailorflat says:

    I personally am disgusted with what the BushCo. Administration did throughout their reign of their presidency. But torture (for whatever excuse) is truly outrageous. Plus pre-emptively attacking a sovereign nation without just cause is just as outrageous. The whole group are a bunch of criminal thugs and the Repugnican’t Party is worthless. “Me, Me, Me” is sonomous with their party’s name. I don’t see how this will not become a partisan fight without naming a special prosecutor and that person needs to follow the law and not the party line. The 911 Commission was controlled by the head who seemed to speak for the Repugnican’ts. Why was there no investigation of how specifically George W. Bush and his Unka Dicky ignored the stated desire by Osama bin Laden to attack the U.S. on the homeland prior to 9/11? And remember how viciously Valerie Plame was attacked because her husband reported the lies stated for the Iraq war? The BushCo. Administration committed multiple crimies with their war crimes being the worst!

Comments are closed.

The website is no longer being updated. Watchdog stories have a new home in Nieman Reports.