Watchdog Blog

Gilbert Cranberg: The Iraq War, Colin Powell, and the Press

Posted at 10:06 pm, December 18th, 2011
Gilbert Cranberg Mug

No retrospective on the Iraq war would be complete without reference to the part played by Colin Powell in convincing the country to go to war. Public opinion about the war was lukewarm until Powell spoke at the United Nations on Feb. 5, 2003. He gave such a boffo performance, complete with convincing visual aids, that public opinion turned around virtually overnight in support of war against Iraq.

The nation‘s press was gaga over Powell’s presentation, extravagantly lauding it despite its heavy reliance on unverifiable sources. One of the sources later proved to be “Curveball,“ an Iraqi prevaricator described by a German intelligence official who dealt with him as “not an entirely normal person.”

Powell’s most convincing evidence that Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction was the recording of an overheard conversation between two Iraqi officers that purported to show them plotting to deceive U.N. weapons inspectors. Powell misrepresented the conversation to make it appear much more incriminating than it actually was.

Powell had enormous prestige. One of the tragedies of the Iraq war is how Colin Powell sullied his reputation by putting it at the service of a cause that did not deserve support. Powell has never explained why he twisted the evidence nor did he apologize for misleading the American people.

The press gullibly accepted Powell’s version of events and, in one of the more shameful chapters in U.S. press history, joined the “let’s-go-to-war” chorus. At the time, I wrote a piece in the Washington Post that showed typical editorial comment on Powell’s speech from a survey of about 40 newspapers.

Here are some of the comments:

“The core of his argument was unassailable,” “a persuasive case for anyone who is still persuadable,” “an accumulation of painstakingly gathered and analyzed evidence,” “only the most gullible and wishful thinking souls can now deny that Iraq is harboring and hiding weapons of mass destruction,” “the skeptics asked for proof; they now have it,” “a much more detailed and convincing argument than any that has previously been told,” “Powell’s evidence…was overwhelming,” “an ironclad case…incontrovertible evidence,” “succinct and damning evidence…the case is closed,” “Colin Powell delivered the goods on Saddam Hussein.” “If there was any doubt that Hussein…needs to be stripped of his chemical and biological capabilities, Powell put it to rest.”

The press has a lot to answer for its part in getting the country into a costly and unnecessary war. There have been occasional mea culpas by a few news organizations, but no institutional confession of error. To the American Society of Newspaper Editors and the National Conference of Editorial Writers, it’s as though the Iraq War never happened and their members were entirely blameless.

2 Responses to “The Iraq War, Colin Powell, and the Press”

  1. Richard Karpel says:

    I didn’t join ASNE until 2010, but as far as I know the organization made no statements for or against the Iraq War. So why would we issue a mea culpa?

    Richard Karpel
    Executive Director
    American Society of News Editors
    11690B Sunrise Valley Drive
    Reston, VA 20191
    Phone: 703/453-1120
    Fax: 703/453-1133
    Twitter: @rkarpel

  2. reggie_l says:

    You didn’t add that German intelligence would not let U.S. intelligence speak directly to curveball. And Powell never spoke directly to German intelligence. So Powell said whatever George Tenet told him. Why does no one ever pin this on George Tenet? After the Powell made his speech, does anyone remember Germany speaking up with the truth about curveball. No. So what do we have now? We have Nabucco and other large pipeline projects being discussed to bring Iraqi gas up to Germany’s doorstep. Nabucco is named after a Verdi opera about Nebuchadnezzar, a Babylonian king frequently referenced by Saddam Hussein (google it). “Successor of Nebuchadnezzar” was even one of Saddam’s titles. Part of his military was referred to as the “Nebuchadnezzar Division”. Yet, a wack job held by German intelligence and not allowed to speak directly US intelligence or Powell leads to the invasion of Iraq and the planning of the “Nabucco” pipline? From my research, I get the sense that the pipeline was even named before the invasion was announced. This topic has been treated too simply by everyone who has ever covered it.

Comments are closed.

The website is no longer being updated. Watchdog stories have a new home in Nieman Reports.